OK. If I understand you correctly, you would keep functions `message' and
`minibuffer-message' as they are now. You would not eliminate either
function. The former's default behavior would use nil for
`minibuffer-message-at-end'; the latter would use non-nil.
No. The idea is that `message' would obey whatever the value
of `minibuffer-message-at-end' happens to be.
`minibuffer-message' could work by binding `minibuffer-message-at-end'
and calling `message'.
You are not interested in any wrapper function that uses the minibuffer
state (active or inactive) to determine the `minibuffer-message-at-end'
behavior.
Is that correct?
There is no need for one. `minibuffer-message-at-end' would have no
effect when the minibuffer is not active.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
