Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We're not talking about breaking compatibility, but about fixing it. > I agree we shouldn't break compatibility for no reason, but I think > that preserving backward compatibility is a waste of our time in > such a context. Of course, if Hrvoje wants to distribute his > package separately and wants it to work with Emacs-20, that's > perfectly fine and not necessarily a waste of time, but emacs-devel > has a different focus.
I do want to distribute the package separately, but I am not interested in Emacs 20 compatibility. I am interested in Emacs 21 compatibility, because it is what I now use, and I am interested in XEmacs compatibility because the package was written for and is still distributed by XEmacs. Obviously, I also care about the package working in the latest Emacs. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
