Index: emacs/man/gnu.texi
diff -c emacs/man/gnu.texi:1.5 emacs/man/gnu.texi:1.6
*** emacs/man/gnu.texi:1.5 Thu Jul 7 22:54:34 2005
--- emacs/man/gnu.texi Tue Jul 12 06:18:38 2005
***************
*** 382,394 ****
difficult.
People who have studied the issue of intellectual property
! [EMAIL PROTECTED] the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.'' That term is
obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together
various disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I
urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely,
lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent
! issue. The way to be clear is to to discuss patents, copyrights, and
trademarks separately. See
@uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more
explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully
--- 382,394 ----
difficult.
People who have studied the issue of intellectual property
! [EMAIL PROTECTED] the 80s I had not yet realized how confusing it was
to speak of ``the issue'' of ``intellectual property.'' That term is
obviously biased; more subtle is the fact that it lumps together
various disparate laws which raise very different issues. Nowadays I
urge people to reject the term ``intellectual property'' entirely,
lest it lead others to suppose that those laws form one coherent
! issue. The way to be clear is to discuss patents, copyrights, and
trademarks separately. See
@uref{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml} for more
explanation of how this term spreads confusion and bias.} carefully
_______________________________________________
Emacs-diffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-diffs
