Nuutti Kotivuori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bastien wrote: >> The only thing that still tickles me here is that the *default* priority >> is not the *easiest* to assign. So why not this: > > I've never understood what's the difference between a line with the > default priority and a line without a priority at all. That is, with > the default settings: > > * [#B] Foo > * Bar > > Are these not equivalent in priority sorting? If so, why should the > default priority be ever explicitly said?
I never use [#B] priority. I only set A and C. I'm in the habit of globally replacing [#B] with nothing since I think the task item looks much cleaner without it (since it shows up in timelog reports and on the agenda). Bernt _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
