Carsten Dominik <dominik <at> science.uva.nl> writes: > I cannot reproduce the indentation you are getting - are you > re-indenting the lines > with TAB or so?
In fact what happens is that any CLOCK below another one that has a note is indented more than the CLOCK above it: Eg (from a real org-mode file this time) CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 14:36]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:40] => 0:04 - Updating wiki about mlc. CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 13:28]--[2007-10-03 qua 14:36] => 1:08 - Debugging mlc. CLOCK: [2007-10-03 qua 11:46]--[2007-10-03 qua 12:10] => 0:24 This also means that any body text underneath the clocks will be indented differently depending on whether there are notes to the clocks. > > and the useful information about the subtask is in > > danger of being swamped by a mass of reverse-ordered progress logs. > > Actually, I have been bothered by that too. Maybe we should have > a special CLOCK drawer and make all those entries go in there.... Yes, that would make sense. I thought about it but then decided I didn't like the idea of having drawers for all the subtasks - as if that would be noisier than having lots of CLOCK entries in all the subtasks! I'll try tweaking the clock-out function to put completed clocks into a drawer, and see how I like it. Cheers, Tom SW. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode