On Oct 5, 2007, at 22:34, John Wiegley wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think using LOGGING is a bit better.
So what do I do? More votes?
If you want to start using the facility for generally overriding Lisp
values,
then your original proposal is better. But if this is just going to
be for a
few exceptions, LOGGING fits much better with the present scheme and
docs.
Generally overriding Lisp values would be a great feature, but I feel
that this
implementation seems to promise that you can set any lisp value there.
This would
lead to a large overhead, because every command would have to locally
parse
before execution. Also there would be uncertainties because many
commands
act on several items etc.
I am not yet convinced that this is useful enough - so for the
time being I will stick with the LOGGING property.
Thanks for all comments!
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
