Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Hey you mentionned in your first email that the manual explicitely said >>> the two sets should have different keywords, so "bug" is a bit too much >>> here :-) >> >> You misunderstand. When you try to switch it says "1/2" but wont >> switch. It should not recognise the second if you cant switch to it I >> think. > > So your proposal is to ignore the second set if it is not well > defined?
Yes. I was confused for a while as to why I couldn't select the second set. Or maybe no. But let the user know why they cant be used. It might be even better to really allow the selection. The next state change must be preceeded by a sequence selection each and every time if you are not wanting to use the default (first) sequence. That would make sense to me too. > > Maybe this would be even more confusing for the user: having 1/2 in the > echo-area and not being able to get 2/2 makes you wonder what is wrong > with the second set... what you precisely did. If the second set is > simply ignored, then the user will be tempted to make Org know about > it rather than fixing it. > >>> Would you use this? >> >> Probably not as my initial query was more interest than anything else > > :-) > >> and I don't know what TYP_TODO is off the top of my head:-; > > Org used to handle the cycling through SEQ_TODO and TYP_TODO keywords > differently -- looks like it's not the case anymore... _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
