On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:39:07PM +0000, Bastien wrote: > Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I suppose it depends on the relative merits of parsing the mail via > > the mutt helper (which is Perl in my case) vs. doing it with elisp. > > In fact, I was not thinking of "parsing" the message. I imagined that > the mutt helper would just tell where the message file is, then Emacs > would do the job of creating a link by visiting this file
That's going to be costly for mails with very large attachments. > storing all relevant information into the properties of this link ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ By "relevant information" presumably you mean the mail's subject, sender, recipients, message-id and so on? In which case the mail (header, at least) has to be parsed at some point, no? > those properties being immediately reusable by a template. Yes, that's certainly desirable. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
