"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I feel tempted to bring up my suggestion of [markup|text] format
> again, but I've been resisting because I feel like a develish nag. So
> [*|at-syntax] could still be html specific if you really want
> something html specific, but there would be something that could be
> portable to all export formats. It would just be a matter of deciding
> what 'org' marks should be supported and making sure exporters try to
> support them. And of course there are other ways to get around *at
> syntax*.
I would vote against heavily mark-up format like that. I
guess the original design of org-mode is to make a simple
text file that can make personal information organization
much simpler in emacs, as opposed to those half-mark-up
languages like emacs-muse.
I would suggest to keep current method, which is converting
everything that could be converted. To resolve the
complication in some circumstances where conversion of `[1]'
or `_', `^' and etc. is not wanted, I would propose that we
can just use one of the mark-ups, `=code=', and make it be
actually `=verbatim='.
These are just what I think. Probably there is another way
to go: merge with emacs-muse!
Xiao-Yong
--
c/* __o/*
<\ * (__
*/\ <
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
