Hi Wanrong,

Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Finally, I decided to learn some elisp debugging techniques and as a
> practice, it seems I found the bug and fixed it with this patch (against
> org.el in 5.16b)
>
> @@ -24437,7 +24437,7 @@
>           (when (re-search-backward
>              "\\(<p>\\)\\([ \t\r\n]*\\)\\=" (- (point) 100) t)
>         (setq par (match-string 1))
> -        (replace-match "\\2\n"))
> +        (replace-match ""))
>           (insert line "\n")
>           (while (and lines
>               (get-text-property 0 'org-protected (car lines)))
>
> I am not completely sure whether this is the right fix, but so far the
> output looks OK to me.

Thanks for this.  I think the patch is safe (I'm testing it for two or
three days now) but I cannot predict it will be in any cases.  I guess
Carsten will have a better call on this.

(BTW, the issue your raising here concerns the way the HTML code *looks*
and IMO they are less important than issues regarding the correctness of
the HTML code... Just a thought.)

-- 
Bastien


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to