Christian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tim O'Callaghan <tim.ocallaghan <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> Yes. My idea was essentially, when i ask org to create an agenda >> buffer, it knows to auto-pull and process each all of these >> active links, so as to be able to display them in my Agenda. > > I still don't quite understand why you do not use existing infrastructure such > as the include statement in diary files and the org-agenda-files variable > which > lets you define a list files to be included for agenda generation.
The include statement in the diary file is enough for inclusion of diary files. Adding files in org-agenda-files would be enough when we don't need to have a certain file included depending on the content we're processing. I think the rationale behind Tim's idea is: - make it possible to *dynamically* process a list of agenda files (instead of the static org-agenda-files) - make it possible to fetch remote/shared resources so that you can *collaborate* over the network with Org files. The horizon is to handle Org files in a more dynamic, modular, distributed way © ... But maybe Tim has better/simpler arguments. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
