I use mercurial just because it's supposed to work better with windows (work). -Hugo
On Jan 31, 2008 1:34 PM, Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > > > > >Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>I am considering the idea to move the org development to a public > > >>git repository. > > This would be superb! > > > >>This is not yet sure and official, but if you want to take a look > > >>at the > > >>current state of the repository, check out > > >> > > >>http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode.git > > > > > >\o/ :) > > > > > >I love git... everything else sucks by comparison :) > > > > As far as I can see, mercurial is pretty similar. But > > compared to cvs, svn, yes, I totally agree. No looking back. > > Hear hear! mercurial is very similar, and the two of them seem to be > streaks ahead of pretty much everything else. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
