I think simplicity would be the biggest advantage. I started with Org-Mode about six months ago and I think I've noticed an increase in the complexity (that's probably also partly due to reading threads on this list which, arguably, is a portal into the most complex aspects of Org-Mode).
I need to re-think/re-consider my suggestion and articulate it more clearly, I think! -- Clint On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Sven Bretfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > "Egli Christian (KIRO 433)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> TaskPaper seems to be a really simple way of documenting tasks in text > >> with a GTD style. Here's an example: > > > >> I think it would be extremely useful to incorporate TaskPaper into > >> Org-Mode. > > > >From what I can tell Taskpaper seems to be a subset of org-mode. How > > would an integration of TaskPaper look like? What features does > > TaskPaper have that org-mode doesn't have? > > I just read through the web-description and had a short look at the > code of tastpaper.el. And the very same question appears to me. > > The only thing I can imagine why one should prefer taskpaper.el over > org is its simplicity. org-mode has grown quite complex in the last > few months. That's an advantage, of course, but might prevent new > users from giving it a try. However, an integration of both modes > would rise the complexity. > > I may be wrong. Which advantage do you see, Clint? > > Greetings > > Sven > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > -- -- Clint Clint Laskowski, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
