Joel J. Adamson wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jose, Manish
I don't really think that it would be reasonable to make any entry
that contains a string that looks like a time show up in the agenda.
I think I missed part of this conversation. If I put
** Wash the dog <2008-04-10 09:56 >
in one of my org-agenda-files, it shows up at 9:56 in the agenda
time-grid. Is this not the intended behavior?
Joel
Yes, that is intended behavior and it works fine. The question was
whether a time range without a time-stamp would work as well. something
like...
** 9:55 am - 10:15 am wash the dog
- would put this task in "today's" agenda view.
I see Carsten's point about not wanting to recognize any arbitrary text
string which looks like a time to be considered a
"time-of-specification". A possible compromise is to have a string which
looks like "<10:15-10:30> " to be considered as a task for today which
appears @ the appropriate time in the agenda view. The beauty is that
(a) you avoid having to type in extra keystrokes to schedule it, (b) no
need to clutter with an additional date and (c) if it doesn't get done
or something, when I do the agenda view tomorrow, it shows up there as
well and it doesn't get lost.
Of course, I may be asking for things that may have other negative
implications, since after all, I'm still a rookie with org mode (still
wet behind the ears) and maybe there are better approaches to this. :-)
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
