Hi Carsten,
I thought I'd jump in with my 2 pennies:
http:foo.html is a bad habit because (just perhaps) the HTML file
isn't accessed by http, and then the internal links break. So if the
generated HTML documents are stored locally (I fantasize that someday
my PSP will be able to do this) and accessed using a file:// link, the
HTML spec requires the browser to ditch the protocol and use the
specified one, which won't work if my PSP is offline.
-Ben
On 2008-04-13 Sun, at 17:54:33 +0200, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:54:33 +0200
From: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] export to html and relative links:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to
author a relative URL is a bad idea.
Can you explain why you think that this is a bad idea?
Educate me! What is wrong with writing http:foo.html ??????
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
