Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes: > Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes: > >> Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> writes: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> it seems that tangling from an indirect buffer does not work. Is this by >>> design or a bug? >> >> I don't think that's by design. >> >>> Would it be possible to make this possible? >> >> Does the below patch work for you? If so, I can test it more thoroughly >> and send a proper patch. > > Yes - works perfectly. I would really appreciate this. Please submit.
Patch against maint attached.
>From 57beac5636d8be61c0e778d8b3f6da9d6ad208a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:48:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix tangling in indirect buffers * lisp/ob-tangle.el (org-babel-tangle-single-block): Get file name from base buffer. (org-babel-tangle): Use file name from attribute list returned by org-babel-tangle-single-block. Reported-by: Rainer M Krug <rai...@krugs.de> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/100845> --- lisp/ob-tangle.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/ob-tangle.el b/lisp/ob-tangle.el index d20c2b3..cf48db3 100644 --- a/lisp/ob-tangle.el +++ b/lisp/ob-tangle.el @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ (defun org-babel-tangle (&optional arg target-file lang) (base-name (cond ((string= "yes" tangle) (file-name-sans-extension - (buffer-file-name))) + (nth 1 spec))) ((string= "no" tangle) nil) ((> (length tangle) 0) tangle))) (file-name (when base-name @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ (defun org-babel-tangle-single-block (start-line (save-restriction (widen) (+ 1 (line-number-at-pos (point))))) - (file (buffer-file-name)) + (file (buffer-file-name (buffer-base-buffer))) (src-lang (nth 0 info)) (params (nth 2 info)) (extra (nth 3 info)) -- 2.5.1
-- Kyle
