On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> wrote:


> > So it looks like Scheme is not a Babel language after all.
>
> What do you mean? There is an ob-scheme.el but it's buggy: I suspect
> that every ob-*.el is buggy to some extent. Does that mean that every
> language that babel supports is not a babel language?
>

I only mean it can't be used as it now is. I was only three simple example
code snippets into this when it proved inoperable. I wanted to use it as a
study aid for HTDP or SICP or one of the other Scheme tutorials . . . as in
make some personal comments around code samples.


>
> > Is there a formal "bug report" to do?
>
> Well, whether a formal bug report will help is not clear: it's probably
> best that one be submitted if only for documentation purposes, but
> whether it will be addressed or not very much depends on somebody
> picking it up and fixing it. You might be able to persuade "Möbius"
> to sign FSF papers and submit his implementation (but note that there
> are limitations there, as mentioned on the page you linked - so there
> will be bugs...)
>
> I keep putting off learning elisp. Maybe this is the "Schub" I need. You
know, stop being such a needy org-mode tourist and start being a local. :-)

Reply via email to