Le 21/09/15 à 08h30, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> a écrit :
> Hello, > > Denis Bitouzé <dbitouze-39zsbgiqgt5gwvitb5q...@public.gmane.org> writes: > >> BTW, do you agree with the other issue I reported: >> >> #+begin_src org >> - A [[/rootsite/somepage/][(relative) page]]. >> - A [[/rootsite/somepage][(relative) page]]. >> #+end_src >> >> is exported as: >> >> #+begin_src markdown >> - A [(relative) page](file:///rootsite/somepage/). >> - A [(relative) page](file:///rootsite/somepage). >> #+end_src >> >> whereas, IMHO, the expected behavior should be: >> >> #+begin_src markdown >> - A [(relative) page](/rootsite/somepage/). >> - A [(relative) page](/rootsite/somepage). >> #+end_src > > Not really. If a link URI starts with "/", it is assumed to be an > absolute file name. Is it a shared rule? Using relative file names is rather common in CMS... And this rule is not the same applied for image files: #+begin_src org [[/rootsite/somepath/file.png]] #+end_src leads to: #+begin_src markdown  #+end_src and not to: #+begin_src markdown  #+end_src > Try prepending http:// to your URL. #+begin_src org - A [[http:///rootsite/somepage/][(relative) page]]. #+end_src leads to: #+begin_src markdown [(relative) page](http:///rootsite/somepage/) #+end_src which is the interpreted as is when rendered as html page as: #+begin_src html <a href="http:///rootsite/somepage/";>(relative) page</a> #+end_src hence isn't relevant. Regards. -- Denis
