Mail von Stefan-W. Hahn, Sat, 24 Oct 2015 at 08:48:47 +0200: Hello,
as I observed there is a change in behaviour of org-return from on commit 4e864643bdb6bba3e000ea51fb746a26e40b1f77 Author: Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Sun Oct 18 09:36:15 2015 +0200 for timestamps, date ranges and any link. The same change of behaviour was done for org-open-at-point from on commit d75fa9febc676af4893fba9e4d53d5babbb801aa Author: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> Date: Sun Mar 2 10:32:51 2014 +0100 for timestamp, any link and footnote-reference (perhaps other I'm not sure). For example of a link: [[link][description]]x If cursor was at position x the old behaviour of org-return (hitting <RET>) was to open a new line, and position the cursor at the beginning of the new line. The old behaviour of org-open-at-point was to say "no link". For me this seems consistent because if you go with the cursor over position x you see no hint and mouse-click do nothing. You have to go over the link to see face changing and be able to mouse-click top follow the link. Additonally description of org-open-at-point say "... When point is on a link, follow it....", not "on or after". Also if you insert a link by yanking or org-insert-link cursor is positioned directly after inserted link, cursor pos x s.o. With old behaviour you can behaviour you can straight hit <RET> to get a newline. With new behaviour you have to add space before <RET> or call open-line and position the cursor. For me the new behaviour seems inconsistend itself because everytime I want to get a new line I noew have to check if cursor is positioned right after a timestamp, or link. Or I have to shutoff org-return-follows-link. Are there any other org'ers with opinions about this behaviour? I'm really interested in your and others opinion about this behaviours before building some workarounds for me personally. (Perhaps I have overseen something in the big pictures?) With kind regards, Stefan P.S. Excue me if not being subtle enough, its difficult to me beeing subtle in a foreign language. -- Stefan-W. Hahn It is easy to make things. It is hard to make things simple.