John Wiegley <jwieg...@gmail.com> writes: > Since it scales for my use case, can I please have a customization variable to > relax this restriction?
I'd rather not have syntax too much customizable, for portability, ease of maintenance, too. There are already too many mistakes in that area. Also, please note that previous behaviour didn't handle some pathological cases (e.g., property drawer in a comment block, or past an inlinetask). Fixing that properly, i.e. parsing the section all the way down to the drawer, would probably have had an impact in your use case. The current behaviour is technically much more reliable. > I prefer PROPERTIES drawers at the end, and would prefer not to trade > something I want for something that doesn't affect me. If you need to end your entry with a drawer, couldn't you put any of them there? You can even have one there named "PROPERTIES". Regards,