Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Hello, > > Martin Carlé <m...@aiguphonie.com> writes: > >> On 2015-11-04 Wed 14:14, Andreas Leha wrote: >> >>> ,--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> | > I'd say it is a bug if the results from evaluation differ between >>> | > manual evaluation and during export. >>> | > >>> | > And even if it is not explicitely contradicting the manual [1] (which >>> | > does not say anything about finding references), I'd prefer if >>> | > references in COMMENT'ed sections are not found -- neither during export >>> | > nor during evaluation. This would be more inline with my intuition of >>> | > COMMENT is equivalent to # (which is also suggested by the fact that >>> | > COMMENT is described in the section on #). >>> `--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I'd like to strongly support this view. > > Fixed, in master (02c78501472fba94f8cf5a3d218b5c8845b28827). > > Thank you. >
Thank you. Regards, Andreas
