Gustav Wikström <gus...@whil.se> writes: > Ok, fair enough. A bit more difficult to follow the code now (in my > opinion)
I honestly don't think so. Of course, YMMV. > but I guess it saves a few I/O's. If `setq' can be avoided (assuming a context of lexical binding) it's better, indeed. > There was a small error in your edit though. The push-statement feels > lonely outside of the let*. Duh. Fixed. Thank you. Regards,
