> > Yes. And CSL and biblatex are far more complex and robust than bibtex. > :) I use biblatex (biblatex-chicago), which finally gives those of us in > the humanities robust automation of complex footnote styles. One of my > dreams for citation processing in org mode is to be able to achieve in > org the same level of automation, thus allowing non-LaTeX backends. IMO, > the best hope of accomplishing this is to plug into the existing power > of CSL, which has emerged as the new standard for automated citations. > > (A note: the other way to accomplish this right now it to export a file > to org or markdown --- evaluating code blocks, etc. and converting > citations to [@some_cite_key] --- and then running the output through > pandoc, which uses CSL.)
On this note, it is also possible to have org-ref either insert pandoc syntax, or replace the org-ref links with pandoc syntax as a pre-filter. Alternatively, when you export markdown documents with org-ref citations, they export as pandoc syntax right now. > > Best, > Matt -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
