William Denton <w...@pobox.com> writes: > On 5 December 2015, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> However, this report raises an interesting question about footnotes: >> should we still support plain (e.g., "[1]") footnotes in Org documents? >> >> The pattern is very common an regularly introduces false positives. >> Also, IIRC, it was introduced for non-Org buffers (e.g., in Message mode >> buffers), to provide some common features with "footnote.el" library. >> >> I think we could remove this kind of footnotes, and yet preserve >> `org-footnote-normalize' to change Org footnotes into these ones, for >> foreign documents. > > +1. The false positives are a common problem for me, and [fn:1] works > cleanly > and clearly.
Same here. +1. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
