Andreas Leha <andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: > Exactly. I guess my implicit question was, whether we should aim to > make :imagemagick accept 'no' as nil to be consistent with the general > org babel conventions. > > As I get it, you would say: no.
Not at all. My main concern was to fix the issue. This is another one. We could accept "no" as nil. Patches welcome. Meanwhile, we could also add a rule to `org-lint' warning about deprecate use of "yes" and "no" and suggest to slowly switch to nil and t, if that's really important. -- Nicolas
