> Does that mean that it's possible that a function definition contains > unexpanded macros?
Yes.
> Does that mean that `symbol-function' will expand them?
AFAIK it currently never happens there, but if your code relies on this
property it's probably got a bug.
> Does that mean that if I define a macro, then a function using that
> macro, and then change the definition of the macro, the behavior of the
> function is undefined?
Yes.
Stefan
