Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>> how about using a postamble function instead of html-postamble-format
>
> Does it mean that I need to look into modifying the
> org-html--build-pre/postamble function?
>
No, Robert is talking about the variable org-html-postamble,
which you can set to a function. No need to muck around with
the internals of org.
C-h v org-html-postamble says
,----
| org-html-postamble is a variable defined in ‘ox-html.el’.
| Its value is auto
|
| Documentation:
| Non-nil means insert a postamble in HTML export.
|
| When set to ‘auto’, check against the
| ‘org-export-with-author/email/creator/date’ variables to set the
| content of the postamble. When set to a string, use this string
| as the postamble. When t, insert a string as defined by the
| formatting string in ‘org-html-postamble-format’.
|
| When set to a function, apply this function and insert the
| returned string. The function takes the property list of export
| options as its only argument.
|
| Setting :html-postamble in publishing projects will take
| precedence over this variable.
`----
Try
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun foo (info)
"This is my postamble")
(setq org-html-postamble (function foo))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
and complicate the function as necessary to produce what you want.
Of course, you can use an anonymous function too:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(setq org-html-postamble (function (lambda (info)
"This is my postamble")))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--
Nick
