Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> However, I am curious as to why the output from the inline source
> evaluation is different? I.e. why =xxx= versus xxx? What is the
> rationale for one versus the other?
The result of the inline source evaluation is =xxx= (I'll ignore the
no-op results macro around it). If =xxx= can be parsed as a verbatim
object, it becomes \textt{xxx} in the output. If it cannot, = signs
appear as-is in the output.
In the second case, something is preventing =xxx= from being parsed as
a verbatim object.
Regards,
