Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > >> Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes: >> >>> Marcin Borkowski <mbork <at> mbork.pl> writes: >>> >>>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>>> >>>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>>> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >>>> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or >>>> (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out, >>>> though I do not have too high hopes. >>> >>> It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest >>> myself. Firefox/Iceweasel has been serving me well since before it was >>> Firefox, and Pentadactyl has been my primary UI to it for a long time. I >>> don't feel like Mozilla is taking it in a good direction anymore, but if it >>> ever gets too bad, there's Iceweasel, and there's Pale Moon (which has >>> committed to "classic" Firefox extension APIs and UI), and there are other >>> alternatives like Conkeror, uzbl, etc. >>> >>> Even if you don't care about free software, Vivaldi is made by former Opera >>> devs, so how do we know they aren't just repeating a cycle? It could go the >>> same direction Opera went and need to be rebooted again. As long as it's >>> proprietary, that's a risk its users will always face. >> >> I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while now, >> and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard driven, >> which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem to be >> actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations >> for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them... > > Maybe Firefox with keysnail.
That's a new one for me -- thanks!