Albert Krewinkel <albert+orgm...@zeitkraut.de> writes: > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> I don't think so. It would introduce unnecessary complexity. > > I guess that makes sense. Too bad, though. My answer was terse. Let me elaborate a bit. There are a few issues that come to mind when considering this. First, you cannot use regexps to parse an example block anymore. You have to read a line after another until you find the end of the block. This is more complex. Also, it defeats the "-i" flag, which allows an user to ignore indentation in an example block. In any case, as long as fontification is not based on top of the parser, I think we should refrain from introducing too deep changes in the syntax without a serious motivation (e.g., speed concerns, or ambiguous cases) behind it. I sympathize with aesthetics concerns, Org syntax, particularly blocks, is "massive", but I think this is not a sufficient motivation here. Regards,
