Hello, Arun Isaac <theroarofthedra...@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there some other maintainer I should contact? I mean, should I be > posting bug reports and patches to contributed packages on some other > mailing list? This ML is fine. The author is Bastien, who is reading it anyway. > The comment says "Only consider first level headlines". I took that to > mean that only first level headlines will become individual RSS items, > but that all contents under that first level headline will be included > into the corresponding RSS item. Therefore, I concluded that dropping > lower level headlines was a bug. > > But, even if it isn't a bug, I think it makes more sense to include all > content within the first level headline in the RSS item. I don't see a > use case where you would want to drop lower level headlines. Please > correct me if I'm wrong. Fair enough. >> Also, isn't the output of `org-html-headline' >> (`org-export-data-with-backend' is better IMO) a bit verbose? You are >> going to insert <div id="outline-container-..." ...>"... > > I'm not sure what you mean by verbose. I mean that the HTML back-end adds data that may not be useful for the RSS back-end. > The RSS specification does allow HTML within a CDATA section. Besides, > org-export-data-with-backend (with the html backend) also inserts the > "<div id="outline-container-..." ...>" things, doesn't it? My remark about `org-export-data-with-backend' is orthogonal to the output of the function. It is usually better because it doesn't depend on the name of the translators in HTML back-end. Could you send an updated patch? Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou