> Maybe there's a misunderstanding. What Noam suggested was just to > move the code which adjusts search_regs.start[i] and .end[i] to before > the call to replace_range.
Oh, right, that's also an option. It might suffer from another problem,
which is that the match-data will be broken while the
before-change-functions are run, so if there's a save-match-data there
we're back to square one.
Admittedly, before-change-functions is used less often, so it might be
good enough.
Stefan
