thx so much

Joon: thx this is great. one last question. suppose i have multiple code
blocks under  header like this:

**** main i3 conf
     :PROPERTIES:
     :ID:       f17b5518-2695-4484-a958-2fc7b8aa2479
     :tangle:   /home/zeltak/.i3/config
     :END:



is there a way to issue a tangle just for all below the header blocks?

best

Z

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com>
wrote:

> You can `:tangle no' on the source block to exclude it from tangling.
>
> You can even tangle one source block to a different or as many files
> as you like during tangling.
> Sincerely,
>
> Grant Rettke
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Joon Ro <joon...@outlook.com> wrote:
> > can one tangle only the current blocks under header or  can you only
> tangle
> > the whole file?
> > the issue is again for dotfiles managed by org that these files are not
> > proper org babel languages and look like this:
> >
> > #+BEGIN_SRC conf :mkdirp yes :tangle ~/.config/mpv/mpv.conf
> > softvol-max=600
> > #+END_SRC
> >
> > the manual (http://orgmode.org/manual/Extracting-source-code.html) only
> > shows how to tangle the whole file
> >
> > any ideas?
> >
> >
> > If you read the help for org-babel-tangle:
> >
> > With one universal prefix argument, only tangle the block at point.
> > When two universal prefix arguments, only tangle blocks for the
> > tangle file of the block at point.
> >
> >
> > So if you do c-u first before org-babel-tangle, it will only tangle the
> code
> > block at point.
> > I use this a lot so I have the following in my init file:
> >
> > (defun org-babel-tangle-block()
> >   (interactive)
> >   (let ((current-prefix-arg '(4)))
> >      (call-interactively 'org-babel-tangle)))
> >
> > (eval-after-load "org"
> >   '(progn
> >      (define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c b") 'org-babel-tangle-block)))
> >
> >
> > So I can just do C-c b and it will just tangle the code block at point.
> >
> > And I agree with you I with the manual
> > (http://orgmode.org/manual/Extracting-source-code.html) has this
> > information.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Joon
> >
>

Reply via email to