Hello, mc <m...@aiguphonie.com> writes:
> As we talk about link abbreviations, another issue might add some useful > information: > > links of link-type "file" (e.g. "file+new-link"), if follow via an > abbreviation, is not parsed correctly: I suggest to avoid using so called "application" links, i.e., type+application syntax as it may be ditched at some point. You can define a new link type instead, e.g., "newlink" or "applink". In any case, could you provide an ECM? Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
