Ping! Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide your comments? TIA.
> From: Paul Rankin <he...@paulwrankin.com> > Cc: 24...@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:38:55 +1000 > > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:25 +0300: > > > From: Paul Rankin <he...@paulwrankin.com> > > > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000 > > > Cc: 24...@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > > >> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything > > > >> holding it > > > >> up from being included in 25? > > > > > > > > Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already > > > > released. > > > > > > Okay. 25.2? > > > > I don't see why not, provided that Org developers give us their > > blessing. Please bring this to their attention on the Org list, or > > ask them to speak up here. I don't want us to make any changes that > > could adversely affect Org without consulting them first. > > Dear Org Mode maintainers, > > Looping you in on a proposed bug fix for `outline-invisible-p'. > > Briefly, the problem is the function returns non-nil for any invisible > text property when it should only do so for the outline property. As a > defsubst, it is difficult to patch for other affected programs. > > Diff pasted: > > --- /usr/local/Cellar/emacs/25.1-rc2/share/emacs/25.1/lisp/outline.el.gz > +++ #<buffer outline.el.gz> > @@ -388,9 +388,9 @@ > nil 'move)) > > (defsubst outline-invisible-p (&optional pos) > - "Non-nil if the character after POS is invisible. > + "Non-nil if the character after POS has outline invisible property. > If POS is nil, use `point' instead." > - (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible)) > + (eq (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible) 'outline)) > > (defun outline-back-to-heading (&optional invisible-ok) > "Move to previous heading line, or beg of this line if it's a heading. > > Diff finished. Sat Sep 3 14:35:22 2016 >