Hi, >> with org-html-html5-fancy is non-nil, images are exported with something >> like this code: >> >> <figure> >> <p><img src="https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/proof_2x.png" alt="proof_2x.png" >> class="fragment (appear) visible current-fragment" >> data-fragment-index="0"></p> >> </figure>
I'm not an expert of HTML either. However, the "p" tag inside the "figure" is uncommon looking a bit on the example usages online. Thus, I agree with Matt that it should probably not be there. > I'm not well-versed enough in HTML to answer this, but, from Org POV, > there should be a difference between > > A paragraph > > #+caption: foo > [[block-image.png]] > > Another paragraph > > > and > > A paragraph with an [[inline-image.png]] and some text following. > > Would removing the <p> tag blur the difference between the two examples > above ? (I hope I understand your concern correctly). AFAIK, the CSS selector still differs so on the output side they are not alike. I.e. the former is "figure>img" the other is a "p>img". Aside: If anything, removing the "p" tag inside the figure would make it easier to handle images. Rasmus -- Vote for proprietary math!