On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:39 AM Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> wrote: > Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:19 AM Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> wrote: > > > >> We'd want at least one more release from maint, I think, so that'd be > >> 9.0.5. > > > > Would it be OK to sync the current stable 9.0.4, > > I don't think that's a good idea. Since 9.0.4, I've backported one > remaining commit from Emacs, I've adjusted :version in defcustoms to the > appropriate version for a sync targeting Emacs's master, and I've > cleaned up the spacing in a few places so that all the files pass > Emacs's pre-commit check. >
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. > > We never know, we might end up with even higher stable releases by the > > time emacs 26.1 is released. > > I suspect we will, given that 9.0.1 -> 9.0.4 have all been released > since this November. > I don't believe that the target date has yet been set for releasing 26.1. We are currently on the release candidate testing stage of 25.2. So I will not be surprised if 26.1 get released even 3 months or 6 months from now. Eli? John? -- Kaushal Modi
