Colin Baxter <m43...@yandex.com> writes: > On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Colin Baxter <m43...@yandex.com> writes: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >>> >>>> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >>>> >>>>> What is the failure in each case? >>>> >>> ---- snip ---- >>> >>> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+0000) >>> 8 expected failures >>> >>> org-mode release_9.0.5-282-g2e32709 >>> emacs-25.1.1; 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.84-1 i686 GNU/Linux >>> >>> >> >> It might be that emacs 26 shows the failures (both Marco Wahl and I are >> running that, but Colin Baxter runs emacs 25 and does not see them). > > > Unfortunately, the tests pass using emacs-26 too: > > Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 21:21:38+0000) > 8 expected failures > > org-version: 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-288-g4caad0) > GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2017-02-11 > >
Well, I'm running 26.0.50.2, so there is still a possible out. But Marco Wahl is running 26.0.50.1, so there goes that theory :-) I usually run a shell within emacs and I ran `make test' from there earlier. I tried doing a `make test' from a shell in an `emacs -q' and also just from a plain xterm: I still get the four failures. -- Nick