Thanks!
I now understand what you mean by the second call to symbol-value not being
needed. The previous behavior only chose this "branch" of the cond if
symbol-value was not nil. To keep this behavior but only have one call to
symbol-value, why not change to (keep the symbol-value in the cond as
opposed to the body of the branch):
((and (symbolp file) (boundp file) (symbol-value file)))
to keep the old behavior of the cond statement?
YL
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yuri Lensky <y...@ydl.cm> writes:
>
> > The second call is indeed needed.
>
> AFAICT, it isn't.
>
> (cond ('foo) (t nil)) => 'foo
>
> > This is the case fixed by the patch:
> >
> > (setq org-default-notes-file (expand-file-name "~/docs/notes.org"))
> > (setq org-capture-templates '(("t" "Todo" entry (file+olp
> > org-default-notes-file "Inbox") "* TODO %?\n%i")))
>
> OK, I see. I introduced this regression in
> 88a3c2483ee47b342e9bb7d2c1645dce11179bf5.
>
> I applied your patch with a slight change:
>
> ((and (symbolp file) (boundp file) (symbol-value file)) (symbol-value
> file))
>
> =>
>
> ((and (symbolp file) (boundp file)) (symbol-value file))
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
