>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: >> So you are saying we cannot have both. > I'm not. I'm opposed to have overlapping features with two different > implementations, that's all. >> But couldn't the feature of shrink one particular wide column to a >> certain width be implemented using your new implementation? > I already made that offer. Then I really misunderstood you, and apologize. I find the new implementation very useful and useable and I am grateful that you implemented it. > However, the narrowing (as opposed to shrinking) feature is yet to be > defined. In particular, I think width cookies should not be used, i.e., > you shouldn't have to modify _data_ to alter the _view_. I am really not a fan of that current implementation, but it is the only one we have. > It is possible, however, to, e.g., reduce by half the current column, or > to a pre-defined width. That would be great indeed. So please don't drop the branch but instead, if you have time, try that and I would be more than happy to test it and then hopefully narrowing based on cookies could be dropped. Regards Uwe
