Hello,
I've tried to remove line (org-inhibit-logging t) locally, it have solved
my problem partially.

If I clock-in and then clock-out the same headline everything is ok (Task 1
in my example)
. But if I clock-in Task 2, Then go to Task 3 and ckock it in, Task 2
clocked out and have only CLOSED log entry, but it doesn't have log about
change state from PROGRESS to DONE.

Example:

* DONE Task 1
CLOSED: [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
:LOGBOOK:
- State "DONE"       from "PROGRESS"   [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
- State "PROGRESS"   from "TODO"       [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
CLOCK: [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]--[2017-07-29 Sat 16:45] =>  0:00
:END:

* DONE Task 2
CLOSED: [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
:LOGBOOK:
- State "PROGRESS"   from "TODO"       [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
CLOCK: [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]--[2017-07-29 Sat 16:45] =>  0:00
:END:

* PROGRESS Task 3
:LOGBOOK:
- State "PROGRESS"   from "TODO"       [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
CLOCK: [2017-07-29 Sat 16:45]
:END:


2017-07-28 16:44 GMT+03:00 Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:

> Hello,
>
> Рома Рудаков <phentag...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Expected result:
> >
> > * DONE task 1
> >   CLOSED: [2017-07-26 Wed 15:39]
> >   :LOGBOOK:
> >   - State "DONE"       from "PROGRESS"   [2017-07-26 Wed 15:39]
> >   - State "PROGRESS"   from "TODO"       [2017-07-26 Wed 15:37]
> >   CLOCK: [2017-07-26 Wed 15:37]--[2017-07-26 Wed 15:38] =>  0:01
> >   :END:
> > * TODO task 2
> > * TODO task 3
> > * TODO task 4
> >
> >
> > Actual result:
> >
> > * DONE task 1
> >   :LOGBOOK:
> >   - State "PROGRESS"   from "TODO"       [2017-07-26 Wed 15:37]
> >   CLOCK: [2017-07-26 Wed 15:37]--[2017-07-26 Wed 15:38] =>  0:01
> >   :END:
> > * TODO task 2
> > * TODO task 3
> > * TODO task 4
> >
> > There is no CLOSED log entry and change state from PROGRESS to DONE
> > entry.
>
> Logging was inhibited when using `org-clock-out-switch-to-state', but
> not when using `org-clock-in-switch-to-state'. I assume this is a bug,
> so I removed it.
>
> I may be wrong though, so this change is in master only.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>

Reply via email to