Hello, Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> Out of curiosity, what's your stance on supporting time zones in Org's > timestamps? It would be an enormous amount of work, obviously, but in > principle? In principle I agree this would be a very good thing, if possible at all. > That's pretty much what it was before I messed with it, and I was a > little confused because no callers of `org-icalendar-convert-timestamp' > ever used the optional fourth argument at all. My thinking was that > users might want to explicitly set the timezone to "UTC". To be honest > I'm not sure why they would, but I also don't know why we'd accept t > when nothing uses it. I found the whole handling of utc-or-not a bit > confusing. What do you think? I have no strong opinion about this. I was merely concerned about consistency. E.g., when using `format-time-string', I never think about "UTC" for the last optional argument. BTW, as long as Org doesn't support time zones, the "ox-icalendar" property may be prefixed with "ICALENDAR_" (e.g., ICALENDAR_TZ). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
