org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift might be a good starting point, too. It
could be interesting to be able to replace dates within text and
priorities. Good luck!
On Aug 22, 2017 7:10 PM, "Matt Price" <mopto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd love to be able generate dates dynamically using the {{{n}}} org
>> macro, or some other mechanism. I don't immediately see how that would be
>> possible but maybe someone can guide me. I'd want to do something
>> equivalent to this pseudo-elisp:
>>
>> (let ((base-date 2017-09-05))
>> (+ base-date (* 7 {{{n}}}))
>>
>> I haven't looked into how date objects are parsed in org-mode, though, so
>> I have no idea how hard it would be to actually implement something like
>> this.
>>
>
> I made some progress on this (but not much).
>
> I defined a simple macro that adds times together and creates a timestamp
> that org can read -- in fact, this one adds some text as well:
>
> #+MACRO: w (eval (format-time-string "Week {{{n(week)}}} (<%Y-%m-%d %a>)"
> (time-add (encode-time 0 0 0 17 9 2017) (days-to-time (* 7 1)))) )
>
> This does everything that I want *except* dynamically adding time to the
> previous macro call. I tried defining a dynamic version:
>
> #+MACRO: w (eval (format-time-string "Week {{{n(week)}}} (<%Y-%m-%d %a>)"
> (time-add (encode-time 0 0 0 17 9 2017) (days-to-time (* 7 $1)))) ))
>
> And then calling it with
>
> {{{w({{{n}}})}}}
>
> But unsurprisingly and appropriately, that didn't work.
>
> I also took a look at the patch Nicolas used to implement the {{{n}}}
> macro (I've reattached it here for convenience only!). It defines
> `org-macro--counter-initialize` and calls it from inside
> `org-macro-templates-initialize`. I guess I could copy that strategy but
> then I'd be maintaining my own copy of org-macro-templates-initialize,
> which seems like a terrible idea.
>
> So, I'm not sure how best to proceed. For my specific use-case, something
> like this would be a huge timesaver when multiplied over semesters/years.
> But I also wonder whether maybe other people would enjoy being able to do
> date arithmetic inside org files (and outside of tables -- I know from
> Sacha's 2015 blog post that this is possible inside a table --
> http://sachachua.com/blog/2015/06/using-your-own-emacs-
> lisp-functions-in-org-mode-table-calculations-easier-dosage-totals/). If
> other people would also use such code, I could try to hack something
> together for submission. Generalizable functions will be hard for me to
> write because I am sometimes a bit dense. I would love to hear suggestions
> from the group...
>
>
>> Thank you everyone!
>>
>
> ^^ this still applies!
> Matt
>
>
