Hi, > Isn't it already the case?
Sorry, I sent that email without reading the 'applied' email, so it was premature. The fix looks good currently. > I think the current patch is fine. Yours is equivalent, but since we > already bound `raw-path', we might as well use it. yup, that is true, I'm happy with the current patch for now, since we don't have to bind additional variables it ends up being simpler. Thanks, -Jay
