On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:58 PM Kaushal Modi <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that this behavior is on a safe side and good, but there needs to
> be a way for Org to figure out if the stuff following #+RESULTS is safe to
> delete..
>
> Can be probably have #+begin_results and #+end_results instead of
> #+begin_example and #+end_example? And then process the
> begin_results/end_results elements the same as example elements?
>
> That way, we can safely delete/overwrite the begin_results/end_results
> blocks.
>
> In the above example, Org cannot know if that example block is babel
> generated or user-typed.
>
> WDYT?
>
Or may be just do this:
diff --git a/lisp/ob-core.el b/lisp/ob-core.el
index 00f0fe33ecf..f04392a96d2 100644
--- a/lisp/ob-core.el
+++ b/lisp/ob-core.el
@@ -2465,7 +2465,7 @@ in the buffer."
(if (memq (org-element-type element)
;; Possible results types.
'(drawer export-block fixed-width item plain-list src-block
- table))
+ example-block table))
(save-excursion
(goto-char (min (point-max) ;for narrowed buffers
(org-element-property :end element)))
--
Kaushal Modi
