On 01/02/2018 09:43 PM, Ilya Shlyakhter wrote:
> "as a GNU package, we're not allowed to mention proprietary software"
> -- how is that consistent with GNU prominently distributing Emacs for
> Windows from its own website? I think this shows that the guideline
> is not absolute. And it's specifically phrased as a guideline
> ("should"), not as a requirement.
> Emacs for Windows is still free software with source code and everything. BeOrg is not free software. Scott Randby
