Hello, Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes:
> Nothing, please move ahead. Great. > I suggest to rename the file org.org, which will produce org.texi. I don't understand this part. Currently, "manual.org" is exported as "org.texi" per #+export_file_name: org.texi So we are getting the best of both worlds. Am I missing something? > Or org-manual.org, which seems more readable. I think "manual.org" is simpler, but I do not mind renaming it to "org-manual.org". However, I find "org.org" silly. In any case, I let you decide the name before moving forward. > It would be great to have org-guide.org too, but I guess that's a > lot of work. It's a joke compared to manual.org. However, we first need to agree on a style guide for "manual.org". Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
