Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi Tim, > > thanks for your thorough and balanced feedback. > > Tim Cross <theophil...@gmail.com> writes: > >> There is no solution which will make everyone happy. However, as a long >> term org user who hopes to continue using org for many more years, I >> tend to come down on the side of whatever will make org easier to >> maintain in the long term. > > For org-tempo, Rasmus wrote it so I'm inclined to listen quite > carefully at his opinion.
Please don’t. I have not really made any policy decisions of sort. I only missed "<s" once it was cleaned away, and I only "improved/changed" "C-c C-," to better suit my taste. I am not a designer, I just type on my keyboard until it "stuff" works again... Anyhow, my general opinion on these matters is that I wouldn’t want to remove any batteries. I like included batteries... > ... > In fact, I'm inclined to ask the real question: if org-tempo is on by > default, who will have good reasons to turn it off and why? I certainly won’t be :) Rasmus -- However beautiful the theory, one should occasionally look at the evidence
