Hello, Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes:
> Currently if you do M-RET in a checkbox list item, the next item does not > become a checkbox automatically. This patch fixes that. > > I have been using this fix locally for few months. But never got to > submitting it as I need to yet write a test for it. > > Does that patch look good (apart from missing tests). Should I format it > w.r.t to next? or master? IMO, there is nothing to fix. Inserting a checkbox in every item is not mandatory. Furthermore, currently, M-RET inserts a regular item and M-S-RET inserts it with a checkbox. With your patch, both M-RET and M-S-RET do the same thing, which is sub-optimal. My vote is to keep the current behaviour. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
