I'd like to enter some in-line literal code in an org document covering OCaml. For example, in this:
in the expression (x +. y) the +. is a function ... to show in-line code as literal I tried: in the expression =(x +. y)= the =+.= is a function ... being under the impression that bracketing text with = would enclose everything within to be literal. But what's happening -- as evidenced by syntax coloring -- is that the first and second + characters here create a strike-through region from the middle of one literal region to the middle of the other. With (setq org-hide-emphasis-markers t) I'm seeing this: in the expression (x . y) the . is a function ... The + is acting as a markup character, whereas when the above example is entered like so: : in the expression (x +. y) the +. is a function ... it all shows up just fine with the + coming through as a literal character. Is there some way to get the + to show up as literal within in-line sections enclosed by = or ~ ? I suppose I could do something like: in the expression src_ocaml{(a +. b)} the src_ocaml{(+.)} is a function ... But was hoping to use the more succinct = or ~ syntax. Also tried to remove strike-through emphasis altogether by commenting out the strike-through section in org-emphasis-alist like so: (setq org-emphasis-alist (quote (("*" bold) ("/" italic) ("_" underline) ("=" org-verbatim verbatim) ("~" org-code verbatim) ("+" nil) ;; ("+" (:strike-through t)) ))) Then re-started Emacs, but am still having the above issues. Thanks for any help, John -- John Magolske http://b79.net/contact